He will not contend or cry out,
nor will anyone hear his voice in the streets.
A bruised reed he will not break,
a smoldering wick he will not quench,
until he brings justice to victory.
We may sometimes wonder if it would not have been better for Jesus to do something more demonstrably and indisputably divine, proving himself beyond all shadow of doubt to his contemporaries, and leaving an undeniable mark on history itself. But we can see that the reason he did not do so was precisely because if he did contend or cry out in that way many a "bruised reed" would be broken and the nascent faith of many a "smoldering wick" would be quenched.
nor will anyone hear his voice in the streets.
A bruised reed he will not break,
a smoldering wick he will not quench,
until he brings justice to victory.
We may sometimes wonder if it would not have been better for Jesus to do something more demonstrably and indisputably divine, proving himself beyond all shadow of doubt to his contemporaries, and leaving an undeniable mark on history itself. But we can see that the reason he did not do so was precisely because if he did contend or cry out in that way many a "bruised reed" would be broken and the nascent faith of many a "smoldering wick" would be quenched.
If Jesus had chosen to appear as powerful, loud, and impossible to ignore, he would have appealed to precisely the wrong people, those who were least likely to actually internalize his teaching. By contrast those little ones who might have accepted him would have had their little wicks extinguished. So too would people like the Pharisees lose what tenuous grasp on truth that they possessed. They would have either been hardened against Jesus. Or, perhaps worse, they would have supported him because he appealed, not to the better angels of their nature, but to their pride and base instincts. Extracting oneself from serving a Jesus constructed after one's own image and likeness could possible prove harder than being converted from sincerely opposing his message.
Rather than use excessive strength to try to bring about the Kingdom by force, Jesus demonstrated the fact the he was meek and lowly of heart. The King of kings did not come at his opponents with angel armies, but withdrew. The all powerful God allowed himself to become weak, even though it made it appear that his enemies were winning, because by doing so he might make those enemies into his friends. Is this how we would approach it? Even after two thousand years of saints showing us what is possible Christians still tend to lean on their strength rather than allowing God to work through our weakness. How often do we withdraw rather than fight, especially when we know we are right? Doesn't this sound like a recipe for defeat? Consider that, for Jesus, it was part of the path to victory. So too may it sometimes be for us. The point is not that justice will never come to victory. But, rather, it is that the true victory does not come about by the flesh, since the war is not against the flesh, but rather by the Spirit.
I shall place my Spirit upon him,
and he will proclaim justice to the Gentiles.
..
And in his name the Gentiles will hope.
I shall place my Spirit upon him,
and he will proclaim justice to the Gentiles.
..
And in his name the Gentiles will hope.
No comments:
Post a Comment