_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg)
They have taken the Lord from the tomb,
and we don’t know where they put him.”
So Peter and the other disciple went out and came to the tomb.
One thing all of the accounts of the resurrection make clear is that no one anticipated it, no one simply assumed it, or was easily willing to interpret events to mean that it had happen. We can therefore understand that it was not the credulous beliefs of the desperate and the emotionally traumatized. Rather, precisely because they were emotionally traumatized they had a resistance to any suggestion of the possibility of hope. They interpreted death as having the same significance of finality as any modern person might. The fact that their faith hinted at a last day on which the dead would be raised did not not help in this particular instance. That day was too far off to ever impact the reality of their present circumstances. Or so they thought. It is true that Jesus said he had to die and to rise again on the third day. But they never seemed to be able to understand him when he said it. They couldn't understand why he had to die. And they couldn't link it to the Scriptural context of a far off future resurrection. Yet in spite of all this, they were unable to ignore the signs that something unprecedented had occurred. They tried, it is true, to categorize that event, to fit it into preexisting boxes. But it continued to fail to fit until they eventually encountered Jesus himself.
When Simon Peter arrived after him,
he went into the tomb and saw the burial cloths there,
and the cloth that had covered his head,
not with the burial cloths but rolled up in a separate place.
The soldiers wanted the body to stay put, in proof of which they guarded even the almost immovable stone that sealed the tomb. So if the body was missing, what then? Grave robbers? But it could not be, since they wouldn't have taken the time to neatly remove the cloth and fold the burial robes. At the sight they began to believe, but did not yet believe fully. Belief was not to be a mere response to the evidence, however persuasive that may have been. Rather it would always stem from an encounter with the risen Lord himself. Only such an encounter could make the Scriptural context of rising from the dead clear, now with Jesus at the very center of the story. Only the recognition of the triumph of life over death demonstrated definitively the reason for the life of Jesus, and therefore the reason for all of history up until that point, and finally also the new horizon and direction for the future that had opened as a consequence.
‘He has been raised from the dead,
and he is going before you to Galilee;
there you will see him.’
Behold, I have told you.”
Being told about the resurrection causes joy to begin to stir in us. But it is still mixed with fear that comes from uncertainty and limited understanding. Like the women at the tomb we need to let the joy guide us into the fullness of encounter with Jesus. It is in his presence that fear is cast out, that contradictions are resolved, our confidence is restored, and our hope is made firm. The disciples on the way to Emmaus demonstrate why we need to experience the risen Lord for ourselves. They had been so certain that Jesus had been the one. Now the women were suggesting that he was still alive. But they simply couldn't process that in the context of the Scriptures as they understood them. Just as with Peter and John, "they did not yet understand the Scripture that he had to rise from the dead". And so, what did Jesus do? He unlocked those very Scriptures for them. He demonstrated how he was at the center of everything described therein, such that it was fair to say that Moses wrote of him specifically (see John 5:46).
Then beginning with Moses and all the prophets,
he interpreted to them what referred to him
in all the Scriptures.
It was not just the Scriptures that did the trick. It was their encounter with the risen Lord through the Scriptures. Not only that, it was in the context of the breaking of the bread, that is, the Eucharist, that this encounter took place. Jesus is always present in his word, which is why the letter to the Hebrews calls it living and active (see Hebrews 4:12). But combined with his Eucharistic presence it is something else again. Or, at least, it can be. If we are there on autopilot the meager abilities of the clergy to preach, even if they are faithful and accurate, might not prove sufficient wake us up to the presence of Jesus among us. But if we let the rumors of joy and words of the angels guide us we ourselves will set off with intention toward the possibility of that encounter. Yet when we prove unable to do so, still too wounded by grief to make much forward motion, he is still more than capable of taking us by surprise and revealing himself to us. But in that case too we must respond for the revelation to transform us. When the possibility of joy arrives among us we must urge it to remain until Jesus makes himself known. Let us say with those disciples, "Stay with us, for it is nearly evening and the day is almost over".
It is only the peace and the joy that only the risen Lord can give that can make sense of the darkness of our world, give our lives value even in spite of death, and our struggles purpose even in spite of impermanence. It is this joy that is meant to define as Christians. It makes us recognizably different from everyone else who must see all of reality against the horizon of eventual death. We must open ourselves to this joy so that the good news may spread to every person in every land. May what was said of the early Christian community also apply to us today: "And the disciples were filled with joy and with the Holy Spirit" (see Acts 13:52).
No comments:
Post a Comment