.jpg)
They had said, "Sir, give us this bread always". But Jesus answered, "I am the bread of life". It was not something they could take and run, nor something that could be had apart from receiving Jesus himself. But although they were interested in what Jesus had to say they were unwilling to embrace a belief deep enough to receive his gift of himself. If he was a prophet, even a great prophet, what sense would it make to consider him bread to be received? Was it not rather the word of God and the wisdom of God that were true bread, and the role of the prophet more to lead people to the feast? They did not realize that Jesus was himself both the word and the wisdom of God, far more than the words contained on the scrolls of the Scriptures. Yet there was definitely a different in order of magnitude of what Jesus promised as a result of receiving him, compared with what was possible through an unassisted reading the Scriptures.
whoever comes to me will never hunger,
and whoever believes in me will never thirst.
The centrality Jesus claimed for himself in satisfying the desires of the human race was breathtaking. Truly, only God himself could be the one to legitimately make such a claim. The crowds were willing to accept that Jesus might be a prophet, powerful and word and deed. But they would not go so far as to believe in him as their God. They had seen signs attesting to that reality. But they refused to open their hearts to him completely and understand.
Everything that the Father gives me will come to me,
and I will not reject anyone who comes to me,
because I came down from heaven not to do my own will
but the will of the one who sent me.
Jesus did not mention the Father's plan in order to indict the crowds as among those not chosen by God, who would therefore be incapable of salvation. Rather, he wanted the crowds to let the Father work in their hearts so that he himself could draw them to Jesus. This was, after a fashion, a plea for them to open their hearts so that he could accept them, because he desired to do so. They probably had a hard time coming to one who appeared to be as human as any one of them. Humans typically expressed favoritism for one person over another. Even the very generous were not entirely equitable when they distributed blessings to others. They will often accept those who were similar and reject those who are too different or who seem to be in competition with them somehow. But Jesus held no such vested self-interest. There were in him none of the human failings that made people so reluctant to trust any normal person so completely. That very fact itself was further evidence that he was not merely a man like any other.
And this is the will of the one who sent me,
that I should not lose anything of what he gave me,
but that I should raise it on the last day.
Jesus was entirely committed to his Father's plan that all people be saved and come to knowledge of the truth. Where as normally people would take a failure to respond to the generous offer personally, Jesus' ego was not bruised by the response he received from the crowds. It was as though he said that he would not give up on them even if they seemed to have rejected him. His message was like a plea, but it was also like a challenge. It was like a plea in the sense that he tried to clear the deck of their preconceptions and invite them to consider him with fresh eyes. It was like a challenge, inviting them to consider that they might have had deeper semiconscious reasons for rejecting him of which only the Father could heal them. They no doubt liked to imagine themselves as savvy rational actors. But the spiritual forces fighting for their destiny were bigger than any of them on their own.
and I will not reject anyone who comes to me
After Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden they were cast out. But Jesus, who was himself the new fruit of the new Tree of Life, would not reject or cast out anyone who came to him. People were all living in various states of having been cast out and rejected by God from the initial state of paradise and immortality in Eden. But in Jesus they could have a second chance to choose to eat from the correct tree. The result, as he said, would indeed be life.
For this is the will of my Father,
that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him
may have eternal life,
and I shall raise him on the last day.
Much of the crowd who heard the discourse about the bread of life initially rejected Jesus. But this did not mean the Gospel had failed. Rather, initial rejection often yielded unexpected opportunities in the future. This was what happened in Acts after a severe persecution of the Church, which was itself now the mystical body of the one who was himself the bread of life.
Now those who had been scattered went about preaching the word.
We ourselves have a role in bringing the bread of life to the world. We who have experienced the peace that only Jesus can give are meant to help bring that peace to the world who still does not know it. And on this journey we will experience rejection, as both Jesus and his disciples did before us. But we must learn to have the commitment of Jesus to the plan of the Father, enough so to extract our personal predilections and vested interests from the process. We must learn to be unfazed by rejection, as Jesus was, and as he also trained his disciples to be. Rejection, is, after all, never final, as long as this life shall last.
With one accord, the crowds paid attention to what was said by Philip
when they heard it and saw the signs he was doing.
There are many things that characterize our modern cities. But great joy is not often one that comes to mind. But it can be. It is meant to be. And it will be if we take Jesus at his word.
There was great joy in that city.
No comments:
Post a Comment