renew your wonders

Housefires - Come To The River

The Kingdom of heaven may be likened to a king
who gave a wedding feast for his son.
He dispatched his servants to summon the invited guests to the feast,
but they refused to come.

When the guests refused to come at first he tried to appeal to them, explaining that the feast he had prepared was extremely desirable. The ones whom he sent to persuade them were messengers like Ezekiel who conveyed the overwhelming goodness of his plan.

I will give you a new heart and place a new spirit within you,
taking from your bodies your stony hearts
and giving you natural hearts.

Some simply ignored this second invitation, preferring the mundane tedium of their farms and businesses to a transformative celebration. But others responded with unexpectedly intense intense hostility, laying hold of his servants, mistreating them, and killing them. These were people who found the message of the prophets to be intolerable. They didn't want new hearts because they were convinced the ones they had were fine, and took offense at the suggestion that there was anything wrong. They were so attached to the current state of affairs in their lives that they found the invitation to the banquet to be threatening. The responded violently in an attempt to silence that invitation, trying to mute the voice of their conscience which resonated with its urgency.

Go out, therefore, into the main roads
and invite to the feast whomever you find.’
The servants went out into the streets
and gathered all they found, bad and good alike,
and the hall was filled with guests.

Not everyone responded negatively to the invitation to the banquet. Those who were not already living lifestyles of smug self-satisfaction saw the invitation for the amazingly generous offer that it was. They knew that they had done nothing to deserve it. It had come to them entirely unexpectedly, as sheer grace. Yet even among this group not everyone could be bothered to make an appropriately complete response.

He said to him, ‘My friend, how is it
that you came in here without a wedding garment?’
But he was reduced to silence.

One person thought he could enter the feast unchanged from his daily life in the world. He couldn't be bothered to avoid soiling his garments with sin en route. He seemed to assume that this sort of worldly contamination would not be a problem, even though a wedding was cause to wear the one's best and finest. He didn't realize the necessity of being robed in holiness and clothed with good works. He was like a Christian who failed to bring his baptismal robe unstained into God's Kingdom. The point, of course, is that it was within the realm of possibility for him to keep his clothing clean or to have it cleaned if necessary. And so too for us. Grace makes it possible for us to be cleansed from all of our impurities, as Ezekiel said. What we cannot do is attempt to proceed to the banquet of the Lamb while ignoring the gradually thickening accretion of sin on our spirits. The individual particles of dirt may seem minor. But the indifference that leads us to ignore them shows contempt for the host of the feast.

We may not be among those who are hostile to God's messengers (though it sometimes depends on what and how they preach to us). But many of us are tainted by lukewarm indifference. We take our daily life of farm and business to be primary and God's invitation to be something to be slotted in eventually, when it fits. But the opposite should be true. Even when we do initially recognize the importance of the invitation we still tend to overlook our own need for transformation, preferring to ignore the stains on our souls rather than to address them. Perhaps we do this because the cleaning process seems difficult. But we don't have to do the scrubbing ourselves. Rather we are meant to come to the living water we find in the sacraments to be washed clean therein. Then we use the grace we have received to make our lives correspond to our stated repentence by living in a way that befits guests invited to the heavenly banquet.

A clean heart create for me, O God,
and a steadfast spirit renew within me.
Cast me not out from your presence,
and your Holy Spirit take not from me.

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

19 August 2026 - hiring strategy

Shane And Shane - Psalm 23 (Surely Goodness, Surely Mercy)

The Kingdom of heaven is like a landowner
who went out at dawn to hire laborers for his vineyard.

This landowner was both odd and provocative. He went to the the market obsessively, again and again looking for people to work in his vineyard. It seemed that he did this because he cared both about his vineyard and especially about the laborers themselves. It pained him to see some standing there "idle all day" because he understood that their dignity was worthy of a higher purpose.

'Summon the laborers and give them their pay,
beginning with the last and ending with the first.'

The only explanation for the specific instructions for the order that the laborers were paid is that the landowner wanted to be intentionally provocative so as demonstrate something that would not have been otherwise obvious. He was clearly more interested in being generous than in the strict demands of justice. The demands of justice were met, but he was willing to go beyond them when necessary to make sure that no one would be lacking at the end of the day. But he must have had the last receive first because he knew that those hired first would have difficulty accepting it. They assumed on the basis of comparison with what those hired last that they deserved even more than the price on which they had agreed with the landowner. However, there were two things that were true, neither of which was always obvious to the workers. The first was that the landowner desired to employee everyone insofar as possible. If didn't hire them sooner he would keep looking until he could find and hire them eventually. The second was that the landowner desired to give all of them a certain amount, independent of the effort the expended. He did value the work they did in the vineyard, else he would not have engaged them in doing it. But he valued the individuals even more and wanted to make sure that, at the end of the day, no one suffered privation.

What if I wish to give this last one the same as you?
Or am I not free to do as I wish with my own money?
Are you envious because I am generous?

We may wonder if such a hiring methodology and payment strategy is truly practical. Wouldn't the word get out, with the result that people would take advantage of his generosity, presenting themselves to his service only at day's end? But notice, he did interrogate those who had been idle all day. Had he discovered that they were trying to take advantage of him we may assume he would have been less eager to set such ones to work in his enterprises. The parable definitely doesn't describe a capitalist system, but neither does it represent a welfare state. It represents something higher than either extreme where the dignity of the individuals involved reigns supreme.

It is precisely this, his concern for the treatment of the workers, that is the thread that connects the Gospel with the first reading, wherein the Lord refuses to tolerate the abuse of the sheep by other shepherds. Whether we are workers in the vineyard or sheep of his pasture his desire is look after and tend us himself. The shepherd who seeks even the one lost sheep is the same Lord whom Jesus represents as the vineyard owner hiring at the last hour. He is relentless in his love for us, refusing to abandon us, and obliterating all obstacles between us. This even includes obstacles in our own hearts, such as greed and envy, that can make us reluctant to allow him to do so. Being and remaining his sheep requires not finding his pastures offensive or intolerable and bolting. We must have hearts like his to receive all that he desires to give us. We must be docile to his care.

The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.
In verdant pastures he gives me repose;
Beside restful waters he leads me;
he refreshes my soul.

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

18 August 2026 - threading the needle

Amen, I say to you, it will be hard for one who is rich
to enter the Kingdom of heaven.

One who is too tethered to this world by attachments may end up like the young man about whom we read yesterday, who was able to live a generally moral life, discover the truth about Jesus, and yet remained unable to take the final steps forward into the freedom offered to him by Jesus. We may think that the problem was with the young man specifically. If so, we underestimate the difficulty of what was asked. The fallen ego is simply too large and the way proposed is far too narrow. Camels are massive. And they are meant to be used precisely to carry other things. Even unladen they aren't going to fit through any knitting needle. Unladen they also all but lose their purpose. The only thing intended for the eye of a needle is a thread. Thus, our egos need a complete transformation from one sort of thing to another if they are to enter the Kingdom of God. The question of the disciples and the response of Jesus makes clear that this is not something that is within our natural capacity.

“Who then can be saved?”
Jesus looked at them and said,
“For men this is impossible,
but for God all things are possible.”

The point then, as it were, is not about merely removing a few things we are carrying. It is about being transformed by God into threads of the beautiful tapestry of the Kingdom he is creating. Rather than receptacles for worldly things we become docile to the higher purpose of unleashing beauty in the world. This does mean leaving behind things to which we were formerly attached. We recognize that doing so can often leave us feeling sorry for ourselves, with a scarcity mindset.

“We have given up everything and followed you.
What will there be for us?”

This is how things look from the perspective of the self-protective ego that always wants to know, 'What about me?'. But from the perspective of the Kingdom we see things differently. This new perspective begins in baptism and will be brought to completion "in the new age" which will be inaugurated when our Lord returns. In the new age worldly realities will be revealed as mere shadows of deeper and more profound truths existing within the Church, the Mystical Body of Christ. The disciples themselves did have had to renounce many earthly goods, and any claim on earthly authority, but their authority as the first leaders of the Church was, if less immediately evident, more important in the grand scheme of history. We may have to give up things or even relationships for the sake of the Kingdom. But even here on earth we already receive compensation that is far greater, if we have but the eyes of faith to see it.

everyone who has given up houses or brothers or sisters
or father or mother or children or lands
for the sake of my name will receive a hundred times more,
and will inherit eternal life.

Jesus himself had divine riches beyond all telling and yet allowed himself to become poor so that he could enrich us by his power and presence among us. This gives us confidence that what is impossible for man is possible for God, for whom "all things are possible". What was first accomplished in Jesus can also be accomplished in us. We can have among ourselves "this mind" that is ours in Christ Jesus (see Philippians 2:5). May the Holy Spirit come and help us to experience the renewal of our minds (see Romans 12:2) so that we can live, no longer as beasts of burden, but as citizens of the Kingdom.

Matt Maher - Lay It Down

Monday, August 17, 2026

17 August 2026 - There is only One who is good

Why do you ask me about the good?
There is only One who is good.

Sometimes it is good to ask clarifying questions about why we have come to Jesus. Yes, he is good. But what does that mean? Have we understood the full ramifications of that fact? If it is true that Jesus is good, but that there is only One who is good, how do we respond? Are we content to make Jesus one source of advice and information among others? Do we defer to his teaching when it suits our fancy? Do we enthrone him partially, but not more highly than various idols in our lives? If we are to truly hear the words of Jesus we can't interpret them as if they were merely human words. If we are to be his disciples we must give him the central place in our lives that his goodness deserves.

If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments."
He asked him, "Which ones?"

The young man knew that he needed more than a mere external obedience. He sensed that there was a deeper issue that could not be corrected by superficially observing the commandments directed toward love of neighbor. No doubt he had truly believed that he observed all of those things, and yet still felt unsatisfied. He knew that even in obeying them there was something missing, some central unifying element that he lacked. He may have felt as though his efforts were insufficient, diffusing inadequate energy toward multiple unattainable goals. Without being able to put it into words, he may have sensed that he was not adequately able to practice love of neighbor, because his life was not properly ordered to the love of God as expressed in the other tablet of the commandments to which Jesus did not directly refer, but was conspicuous exactly for that reason. Had he been drawn to Jesus precisely because in Jesus he sensed the possibility of making this connection and at last ordering his life toward something eternal? There was a sense in which the second tablet of the law was superficially easy to obey, whereas the first seemed more nebulous. But the presence of Jesus, properly understood, made the first tablet concrete. In doing so it also added a new depth of meaning to the second tablet, since love of neighbor became a way to love Jesus himself. It was in fact the case that Jesus was the missing connection and central point that the young man desired.

Jesus said to him, “If you wish to be perfect, go,
sell what you have and give to the poor,
and you will have treasure in heaven.
Then come, follow me.

It wasn't so much the heroic selling of his goods that was essential. That preamble was just to remove some final obstacles that apparently still tied him down. The main thing the young man needed was the same as the one necessary thing, the better portion that Mary had chosen: Jesus himself. The otherwise abstract and unsatisfying nature of the first tablet of the law took on concrete form in the command to follow Jesus. This was not merely a performance or a ritual. It required giving Jesus the central place in his life, of allowing Jesus to reign in him, giving him the authority to direct his choices, not just once, but in an ongoing way. But sadly, as we so often do, the man chose comfort and familiarity over obedience. He did this even though the he immediately experienced the choice to be sad. We know that when people do decide to put Jesus first they experience just the opposite, as did Zacchaeus, who "received him joyfully" (see Luke 19:5) into his home. Let us not choose sin and disobedience when we know they lead to sadness. Let us instead make our constant choice to put Jesus himself on the throne of our hearts. This is the path, the only path, to eternal life, and lasting joy.

Newsboys - He Reigns

Sunday, August 16, 2026

16 August 2026 - not hearing a no

Phil Wickham - House Of The Lord

And behold, a Canaanite woman of that district came and called out,
"Have pity on me, Lord, Son of David!
My daughter is tormented by a demon."

It might have seemed as though Jesus was indifferent to the Canaanite woman, or, worse, in some way hostile to her because of racial prejudice. But though it would have been easy for the woman to assume this, it should not be so for us. The first reading made it clear that God intended to allow "foreigners" to join themselves to him, even to minister to him, becoming his servants. The signs of this plan go back even before the time of Isaiah. We can see it in the divine blueprint of the temple, which had a court intended for the Gentiles. Back further still God's covenant promise to Abraham included the blessing of all nations through his offspring. This was the context of God's plan that Jesus himself came to fulfill. During the time of Solomon the nations came to Israel to seek the wisdom of God. But Jesus was the promised Son of David even more perfectly than was Solomon. Thus his momentary silence before the petitionary prayer of the Canaanite woman had to be something other than indifference or hostility.

The subjective experience of the Canaanite woman must have included the fear that is was precisely because of her nationality that she was not immediately able to find the same access to the healing power of Jesus that others apparently had. No doubt the enemy tried to tempt her into giving up immediately, into assuming that the thoughts of fear and doubt that appeared in her mind were the unchangeable reality of the situation. We face a similar temptation when God does not respond immediately. Our default assumption tends to be that he doesn't care about us. Sometimes this takes the form of us thinking that he doesn't care about this or that specific concern of ours. But we tend to assume the implicit corollary that he would not be indifferent to such a concern if his care for us were real in any meaningful way. Of course, in this way our desires are much like those of children who want what they want when they want it and go on to pout if they can't get it immediately.

There is, however, another way we might and should be like children that is much more dangerous to the enemy and effective in the Kingdom. It is being like the child who refuses to give up because he knows that his parents love him and can provide for him. The situation may still arise where he demands something that would not be beneficial to him. In such a case the parents would not provide him with that particular thing. Yet they would doubtlessly see to it that the underlying need or desire that made the child want that thing, whether happiness, or security, or comfort, or something else, was addressed, to the degree that they were able.

Still we may ask if human parents ever act like Jesus and intentionally place some initial resistance to a request that might have been addressed immediately. The answer to this is yes. Parents often ask children to put in work of their own, even though such work does not necessarily earn the result, so that children can appreciate the value of what they receive. There is often a deeper comprehension that results from persistence and struggle that is otherwise absent.

Although there is an apparent analogy between Jesus and human parents his approach nevertheless also had an aspect that would be inappropriate for human parents. This was his desire to test and thus strengthen the faith of the Canaanite woman. He wanted her to understand that his abundance was not limited by the normal constraints of reality. The only way to believe this was through faith. Faith allowed her to see that apparent barriers and obstacles to receiving the grace and mercy of God were only that, apparent.

Jesus been sent only to the lost sheep. And yet here he was in the Gentile region of Tyre and Sidon, showing that his intended destination would not be the only place to receive the grace of his presence. He never denied the possibility of collateral grace for those whom he encountered along the way. It did not require taking food from the children to feed others. There was such an abundance that all could eat and be satisfied. But he did not explain those things for the woman, in an attempt to ease her difficulty. He wanted her faith to reach out and take hold of them. They would thus become more fully her own faith, rather than mere data, data that she would inevitably take for granted to one degree or another. Parents, on the other hand, aren't the object of such supernatural faith, and thus typically ought not test the degree to which their children believe in them. The analogy goes so far as to say that push back and resistance to some requests is sometimes appropriate. But if parents put their children's belief in them to the test it is likely to result only in uncertainty and even trauma. Whereas here, as a result of Jesus testing her, the Canaanite woman was that she was able to achieve a level of faith in him that would have been otherwise impossible.

She said, "Please, Lord, for even the dogs eat the scraps
that fall from the table of their masters."
Then Jesus said to her in reply,
"O woman, great is your faith!
Let it be done for you as you wish."

There is a real way in which faith brings the blessings of the future, of the world to come, and of the life of the resurrection, into the here and now of the present. To do so it must contend victoriously with all the negative thoughts and doubts that try to make us believe that things are hopeless. Paul knew that the mind was a battlefield and that faith required a strategy, which was to "take every thought captive to obey Christ" (see Second Corinthians 10:5).

Perhaps there are strongholds of fear and uncertainty in our minds that are preventing us from exercising our faith to lay hold of the promises of God. If so, let us turn to his word, and not our doubts, so as to build ourselves up in the truth. If we really know that "the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable" we won't believe the lie that we have been abandoned. When we are tempted to believe that we have been forgotten we should remind ourselves that God "will not leave you or forsake you" (see Deuteronomy 3:6). We will then have confidence that his plan is not just for some people, not most others while excluding ourselves as we are often tempted to think but rather "that he might have mercy upon all".

Saturday, August 15, 2026

15 August 2026 - a place prepared by God

Songs In His Presence - Bright As The Sun

Mary set out
and traveled to the hill country in haste
to a town of Judah,
where she entered the house of Zechariah
and greeted Elizabeth.

The story of the visitation of Mary to Elizabeth intentionally parallels the time was David brought the ark of God to the house of Obed-edom. We can hear this in various echoes from one story to the next, but in particular in these proclamations, first of David, then Elizabeth:

How can the ark of the Lord come to me? (see Second Samuel 6:9).

And how does this happen to me,
that the mother of my Lord should come to me?

The first ark was meant to symbolize the presence of God among men, his dwelling place on earth. But the second ark was actually in a more literal sense that dwelling place, since within her womb God himself became incarnate. The ark was not merely a disposable temporary vessel in the Old Covenant. So we can discern that Mary's role was not meant to cease once the child was born or once he was raised. She meant to and did in fact help convey the presence of her son to others even after the Visitation. She helped Joseph to find him when he was missing, having stayed behind in the temple. She helped those celebrating a wedding at Cana avail themselves of his intercession. She was a presence around whom other disciples could gather to experience the presence of Jesus, at the cross, and then later, on Pentecost as they prayed for an outpouring of the Holy Spirit. We can't describe her role in the early Church as highly active as we might do for Paul or for Peter. But nevertheless it is hard to deny she had a central role. Elizabeth was not misguided when she said that among all women of all times and places Mary herself was the most blessed. It was a fact so incontrovertible that all subsequent generations, if they were honest, would have to acknowledge it, not to her own glory, but rather, to that of God.

From this day all generations will call me blessed:
the Almighty has done great things for me
and holy is his Name.

We know that even in recent centuries Mary still helps the world to experience the presence of her son, whether at Lourdes, Guadalupe, or Fatima. Even as recently as the nineteen-nineties in Slovakia there her presence has been credibly attested, receiving a nihil obstat from the Vatican.

We ought not be surprised at Mary's ongoing role when we consider where and how Ark of the Covenant is described in the book of Revelation.

God’s temple in heaven was opened,
and the ark of his covenant could be seen in the temple.
A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun,
with the moon under her feet,
and on her head a crown of twelve stars.

She was involved in an ongoing way in the spiritual struggle against the ancient serpent, here represented as a red dragon. It was prophesied in Genesis that the offspring of Eve would be the one to crush the head of the serpent. And now the new Adam had clearly involved Mary in the fight. But where Eve was vulnerable and compromised Mary was protected and remained immaculate. Eve was meant to be the mother of the living, but became, in fact, the mother of the spiritually dead. But Mary became the mother of those disciples who keep the testimony of Jesus, the ones who live in the truest sense. She who was now in "a place prepared by God" would from that place continue to intercede on behalf of her children as queen mother of the King of kings and Lord of lords. Her presence continues to matter to us because Jesus intends to bestow his own blessings on us through her. She brings us, safely and securely, to into the presence of her own son, there to help us express our inchoate needs and desires, and to plead to her son that he grant them.

Mary helped John and Elizabeth connect to the presence of Jesus in a way that would have been otherwise impossible.

When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting,
the infant leaped in her womb,
and Elizabeth, filled with the Holy Spirit,
cried out in a loud voice

This was not a gift intended for them alone, which is why so many archetypes of salvation history were fulfilled in Mary, demonstrating her ongoing role in the New Covenant of Christ. But perhaps we aren't currently experiencing the joy that Elizabeth and John both knew in her presence, or the fullness of the Holy Spirit that filled the disciples at Pentecost. Perhaps we've been treating Mary more like a devotional decoration rather than a person with whom we can have a real relationship. It is, in the end, only through such a relationship that the blessing she is meant to be for us can be realized. Mother of God, new Eve, and new Ark of the Covenant, pray for us!

Friday, August 14, 2026

14 August 2026 - what God has joined

Songs In His Presence - Isaiah 12: You Will Draw Water

Some Pharisees approached Jesus, and tested him, saying,
"Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any cause whatever?"

Is there ever any cause so severe that divorce is a valid option? The Pharisees certainly believed that there were such causes, though they disagreed on the severity required in order to be sufficient grounds to justify divorce. But it seemed that Jesus may have acquired a reputation for being much more rigorous about marriage than any Pharisaical school of thought. This should not surprise us since he was the one who taught, "I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart" (see Matthew 5:28) during the Sermon on the Mount.

The Pharisees knew that Jesus wasn't afraid to speak his mind and wanted to provoke him to say something that contradicted the fact that, to their mind, Moses had permitted divorce when he commanded, "that the man give the woman a bill of divorce and dismiss her". But Jesus was on to their game. Rather than referring immediately to Moses, he reached further back, to God's original intention for marriage, to the Garden of Eden. He saw there a blueprint for a relationship that was intended to be a union that could not be broken. Only such a union could serve as an image of the love of the Triune God, or the love of Christ for the Church. Such love was not sometimes yes, and sometimes no, but always and unwavering.

For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother
and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh?

From the fact that the union of marriages is something that was brought about by God, that God himself was in fact the one who joined couples together in each individual case, it follows that such a union could not be broken by the decision of man. What, then, of Moses? Was God being inconsistent when Moses seemed to authorize divorce? Didn't it make the most sense to do what the Pharisees did and project back from the apparent permission and interpret that which came before as well as that which came after in light of it?

He said to them, "Because of the hardness of your hearts
Moses allowed you to divorce your wives,
but from the beginning it was not so.

Jesus taught that Moses was not exactly giving permission for divorce, so much as it was that he was regulating it. It was an unfortunate and, for the time more or less unavoidable practice, that was happening anyway. It wasn't a best case scenario from which God's purpose for marriage could be discerned. It was the best attempt of Moses to mitigate the disaster that the fall had been to marital fidelity. It can be difficult for us to see behind the consequences of the fall, to the time when God looked upon all things and saw that they were very good, and discover his purpose in ordering things as he did. Only the eyes of Jesus was sufficiently clear and courageous to boldly speak that original intention into a world clinging to any license to sin that it could find. Not only the Pharisees, but even his own disciples, found this to be so drastic as to be apparently untenable, practically speaking.

His disciples said to him,
"If that is the case of a man with his wife,
it is better not to marry."

Jesus did not walk it back, even for his disciples. Rather he let them know that this word could not be accepted by everyone intellectually, and was not something that would necessarily make sense in the abstract. If they looked at the possibilities of various difficulties they might face in marriage it would seem impossible, because, humanly speaking, it was impossible. But those who were called to marriage would receive grace that made what was impossible for others possible in their case. It was grace for a specific call. Those who were thus called would be the ones to whom it was granted to accept it, not intellectually perhaps, but in the concrete reality of their relationships together.

Because Jesus referred to a grace specific to the call to marriage, and explained that it was not for everyone, he went on to speak of a different vocation with different graces attached to it, specifically those who "have renounced marriage for the sake of the Kingdom of heaven". This is a vocation we see reflected in the tradition of celibacy for priests in the Roman Catholic tradition. Like Jesus himself, the Church calls out to those who might be called: "Whoever can accept this ought to accept it".

Thursday, August 13, 2026

13 August 2026 - thy mercy free (but ours?)

Sword Of The Spirit Worship - Thy Mercy Free

"Lord, if my brother sins against me,
how often must I forgive him?
As many as seven times?"
Jesus answered, "I say to you, not seven times but seventy-seven times."

If we look at forgiveness as a mere obligation, something we do because we know we should, we're always going to approach it in a very human way, looking for the upward bound of the maximum effort we must expend to fulfill this obligation. From a human perspective doing so is a practical matter, since the thought and effort we expend on forgiveness must be balanced against other priorities and concerns. We are finite, hence we look for a finite amount of forgiveness that will suffice. But this perspective is what happens when we take ourselves as the starting place of our contemplation. Really, we need to remember that our starting place is different, more like the servant in the parable then someone starting from a neutral situation.

At that, the servant fell down, did him homage, and said,
‘Be patient with me, and I will pay you back in full.’
Moved with compassion the master of that servant
let him go and forgave him the loan.

Before we forgive anyone we should remember that we ourselves have been forgiven a much greater amount. The sheer magnitude of the unearned gift of our very existence is already a debt we can never repay. And we have all, in some measure, squandered that gift. Yet the giver remains generous, giving us chance after chance to demonstrate our gratitude for his gift. In justice he could have extracted from us exactly what we owed. But he was too moved by his own love for us to go directly to that option. He demonstrated a love that was meant to transform us from people who operated based on the assumption that we must pay for everything from our own limited and finite resources to people who could live on the basis of his own generosity. He did not forgive our debt in order to make us self-sufficient but in order to transform us so that we could rely on him. We are meant to rely on him not once, for a single event of forgiveness, but continually. The point is not that we show one moment of contrition and then return to life as usual. Rather, we are to rely on him in such a way that we cannot help but become like him. In doing so we transcend our own human limitations regarding forgiveness and become channels of God's own mercy to the world. Since it doesn't come down to us and our resources we don't have to stop when we forgive seven times, but can offer forgiveness without limit, as we have ourselves first received.

When that servant had left, he found one of his fellow servants
who owed him a much smaller amount.

Sometimes we learn the wrong lessons from God's forgiveness. We think it means we narrowly escaped and must now live from an even more all engrossing scarcity mindset. We saw what it would look like to be accountable for our debts and we take all possible measures to avoid ever feeling dependent on God again in the future. But there is no way to do this. Even if we extract everything our fellow servants possess it will never be enough to make us independently wealthy enough to be in a position to bargain with God on equal terms. There is no amount of human effort that will suffice. Any attempt to live out our religion without relying on grace will always result in such a shortfall. If our religion is making us mean and desperate, fearful, and unmerciful, something has going very wrong indeed. We may not literally be choking our fellow servants. But there are many toward whom we show much less compassion and sympathy than God does toward us. There are too many people who beg us, "Be patient with me", while we, in our hubris, refuse.

As with Ezekiel God tries to reveal his plans in advance so that we can learn of them and make our lives correspond to his purpose for us. It is much easier to learn by his instructions than to persist until we face the consequences.

Then in anger his master handed him over to the torturers
until he should pay back the whole debt.

Let's allow the generous mercy that God never ceases to offer to transform us now, not putting it off until later, or ignoring it. How much better it is to be a conduit of grace than a miser of unforgiveness. We can change lives in a way that is analogous to what God himself has done for us. Who are we to hold it back?

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

12 August 2026 - fraternal correctional facilities

Jars Of Clay - They'll Know We Are Christians By Our Love

If your brother sins against you,
go and tell him his fault between you and him alone.

We aren't supposed to let our relationships with our Christian brothers and sisters become compromised by unaddressed issues. As brothers and sisters we have a shared context that should make mutual understanding and reconciliation possible that the wider world does not possess. But even in these relationships we experience the temptation to avoid such problems. We don't see why it should be necessary for us to take the initiative when it was someone else who sinned against us, not we them. We don't fully appreciate the value of restored relationships, so we are willing to let anger fester overnight (see Ephesians 4:26). Or we minimize the problem, so as to avoid an uncomfortable conflict. This is one way we can go wrong when a brother sins against us, by ignoring it. The other is by doing everything except telling the brother his fault between ourselves and him alone. Instead we tell everyone, possibly everyone on the entire Internet, about his fault. But when we tell others in this way it is not because we have any hope that doing so will solve the issue. It will of course only exasperate it. More people will line up to tell us why we are right and ought not be reconciled, now or ever. We will feel increasingly vindicated in our condition as victims making honest and open communication with the brother who sinned almost impossible.

There are situations where the brother will not listen to us, and these are perhaps not uncommon. After all, he probably saw things differently and may already feel righteous, not in need of correction. In such cases we need, not the entire Internet, nor a smaller subset of a population that is only looking for the most recent rage bait, but enlightened objective third parties such as we may hope to find among our other brothers and sisters. If we can find such individuals that are not likely to default to taking our side, but can give both of us a fair hearing, this is the best scenario.

If he refuses to listen to them, tell the Church.
If he refuses to listen even to the Church,
then treat him as you would a Gentile or a tax collector.

If the situation is so serious that the brother has committed to something that cannot be condoned within the life of the Church it is still best to solve it with him at the smallest scale possible. But if this is impossible it is disingenuous to let him go on pretending that everything is fine. If we can find someone who can let him know, in an official capacity, what the truth of the matter is, we ought to even go that far. We do this as a last resort, in hope that our brother will at last listen and be reconciled. This step is our full due diligence after which no more steps are necessary or indeed possible, hence we "treat him as you would a Gentile or a tax collector". This does not necessarily mean that we have no relationship, or that we shun such an individual. Rather it means they are seen once again as one who still needs to receive the Gospel. Jesus, after all, welcomed sinners and tax collectors, but in order that they might eventually become disciples.

Again, amen, I say to you, if two of you agree on earth
about anything for which they are to pray,
it shall be granted to them by my heavenly Father.

Why is it so important to reconcile with brothers and sisters when we have something against them? Because the potential release of power when we are united in the Church is something too good to ignore. When we are united, Jesus is present, prayers are answered, and the world may know and believe in the love of the Father and the Son for humanity (see John 17:23). This is why Paul strongly encourages us "to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace" (see Ephesians 4:3). It is why the psalmist finds such delight in thinking of brothers dwelling in unity, comparing it to "the precious oil on the head, running down on the beard" (See Psalm 133). Probably, we don't value this unity as much as we should. So let us learn to appreciate it enough to work for it.

Tuesday, August 11, 2026

11 August 2026 - who is the greatest?

Cory Asbury - Reckless Love

The disciples approached Jesus and said,
“Who is the greatest in the Kingdom of heaven?”

We still tend to think of worldly answers to the question of greatness. Whether because of office, popularity, or some other gift or asset, we still tend to assess who is the greatest on worldly terms. when we do so it is because we're asking a question about who matters the most and answering it in terms of what is important to us. But this is not how God sees things. He is not impressed by anyone. In fact he seems to favor those who seem to be the least impressive in the eyes of the world.

Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children,
you will not enter the Kingdom of heaven.

Here specifically he did what Mary described in her Magnificat. He cast down the mighty from their thrones and lifted up the lowly. He demonstrated that we don't matter to him in terms of our assets and abilities or status or position. The child he placed before them didn't have an elaborate resume that caused him to be chosen. And yet he, and not any of the great ones of history, was made to be the model for discipleship. It was not to be earned through competition, it was to be accepted like an embrace. First we must learn that we do not earn God's favor. Then, in turn, we must strive to receive others without making them earn our own. We must be able to receive one child such as the one Jesus placed before them, and this because he himself would have done so.

See that you do not despise one of these little ones,
for I say to you that their angels in heaven
always look upon the face of my heavenly Father.

The little ones are valued much more highly by God than we would guess by their status in the world. In the world they would seem to be the least appreciated and most vulnerable among us, the ones on whom people would not waste their effort or resources. But God assigns angels to each one of them, angels privileged to behold the face of the Father, to guard and guide them. And of course, this can include us, if we learn to become sufficiently small to rely on God's providential care.

If a man has a hundred sheep and one of them goes astray,
will he not leave the ninety-nine in the hills
and go in search of the stray?

Again, the wisdom of the world is turned on its head. The world understands things in terms of strength in numbers. It finds marginal losses acceptable and even unavoidable. But to Jesus there is no person who is insignificant. He is unwilling to let even one sheep remain far from him no matter how many are together in the safety of the hills. Jesus sees people as people, not as percentages. But this goes against the worldly idea of what constitutes strength. To seek the one and leave the ninety-nine probably seems hugely impractical and risky to people with a corporate mindset. But the Kingdom insists that no one can be left behind. And somehow, because this aligns with God's own concern for the lowest and the least, it works out, even when by rights it seemingly shouldn't.

And if he finds it, amen, I say to you, he rejoices more over it
than over the ninety-nine that did not stray.

We rejoice over having ninety-nine because it is a large impressive number. Jesus rejoices over one because he recognizes in that one a real person created in the image and likeness of God, beloved by the Father.

In just the same way, it is not the will of your heavenly Father
that one of these little ones be lost.

We need to learn to share the heart of the Father. The way that we do this is by knowing that it is on the same terms, as little ones, that we first come to him. Then we will be able and eager to welcome others, not content until every last little one is found and brought home to his courts.

Monday, August 10, 2026

10 August 2026 - scattered and sown

Dan Schutte - Behold The Wood

Amen, amen, I say to you,
unless a grain of wheat falls to the ground and dies,
it remains just a grain of wheat;
but if it dies, it produces much fruit.

We are called to a transformation that is so comprehensive that our egos represent it to us as dying. The shape we took previously, our understanding of our identity, our boundaries in life and relationships, all must give way. We must reach beyond the boundaries of our finite limited selves in order to put forth roots into the soil, shoots toward the sun, and eventually bear fruit for the sake of others. Ours egos suggest that the appropriate course of action is trying to maintain the structural integrity of the seed for as long as we can, even forever if possible. But how useless, how defective the seed that never becomes a plant after being placed in the soil. It remains inert, lifeless, even sad and pathetic. Can we discern from the image of a seed willfully resisting becoming a full-fledged plant just how narrow are the confines of a life dominated by the ego? If we are unwilling to risk anything we will never become what we are meant to be.

Whoever loves his life loses it,
and whoever hates his life in this world
will preserve it for eternal life.

By loving life in only exactly the shape that it now takes while not being open to more we doom ourselves, since nothing in the mold of the world can last forever. We need transformation to become capable of living life that can truly last forever, eternal life, rooted in the deepest and unchanging reality: God himself. Only by learning to participate in the love that God himself is can we become capable of living with him forever. We see precisely what it means to love in this way through the life and death of Jesus Christ. He offered his own life as a grain, broken open to bear inestimable fruit for the world. In him we see exactly what it looks like for God's divine life to be manifest in the life of human person. Thus, in him, we have the perfect model to imitate.

Whoever serves me must follow me,
and where I am, there also will my servant be.
The Father will honor whoever serves me.

It is not enough to merely imitate Jesus. Or rather, perhaps it would be enough, but our egos resist with such intensity that we can't succeed without the assistance of divine grace. We, the branches, are meant to remain connected to the spiritual energy that flows from Jesus, the vine. He has made it clear that without him we can do nothing (see John 15:5). We remain more or less in the shape of the seed. We need to entrust ourselves to his loving providence in order to become more. This never ceases to be true. It is not something we do once and move on. We never simply crack our shells open and then grow on our own and unassisted, not while this life lasts. We're still in the process of transformation and must continually place ourselves in his hands. Particularly at times when we try to wall ourselves off, close down, and turn in on ourselves, we need to return to him to help us to open ourselves once more.

Once we begin to allow Jesus to tear down our walls and help us move beyond ourselves we begin to exist in a higher mode of life where the miraculous becomes possible in ways that otherwise seem too good to be true. Just listen to how improbable this statement of Paul sounds to the so-called rational mind:

Moreover, God is able to make every grace abundant for you,
so that in all things, always having all you need,
you may have an abundance for every good work.

Not likely, right? But to those seeds who are in the process of becoming fruit bearing plants it makes abundant sense. They know that the limits on which our rational, ego-directed minds insist, are only limits that are based on ourselves as isolated individuals. Being broken open by God reveals that conception for the illusion that it is. Such barriers are only temporary, transitory, meant to give way to something more. So let us learn to trust the plan of the one who supplies the seed "without sadness or compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver".

Sunday, August 9, 2026

9 August 2026 - small craft advisory

Today's Readings
(Audio)

Then the LORD said to him,
“Go outside and stand on the mountain before the LORD;
the LORD will be passing by.”

Our first reading and our Gospel today tell both recount events of theophany, when God revealed himself to Elijah on Horeb, and to Peter and the other disciples on the sea. In both events there was much to distract and detract from the awareness of God's presence. There were dramatic events that preceded his coming that seemed far more impressive than his presence when he finally came. The earthquake, the wind, and the storm at sea were all such powerful events, so obvious and hard to ignore, that they easily could have been mistaken for God's presence. No doubt pagans had done exactly that in other times and places. But Elijah was not fooled by the preludes. There was nothing in creation adequate to express God's glory. Tying that glory to an earthquake or the wind would only result in deeper confusion about his transcendence. It is likely that Elijah had to gradually learn that the voice of the Lord was unexpectedly quiet, a still small voice, a quiet whispering sound. Those who were the most zealous for the Lord seemed like they would be the ones most likely to assume that the sound of his voice would convey unmistakable glory, that it would be undeniable, and impossible to miss. But Elijah didn't move until he heard the tiny whispering sound. He knew what to expect, and therefore must have learned it previously. Something so subtle could not have been something discerned without time and effort. But having expended such effort in the past he was now able to recognize it instantly. We are reminded of how Samuel had to be instructed by Eli in order to know the voice of the one who called him in the night (see First Samuel 3:8-9). Then, having been instructed, he was able to recognize the Lord speaking to him and respond appropriately.

When the disciples saw him walking on the sea they were terrified.
“It is a ghost,” they said, and they cried out in fear.
At once Jesus spoke to them, “Take courage, it is I; do not be afraid.”

At first, the disciples were unable to separate the presence of Jesus from their fear of the storm. But his voice was familiar enough to Peter to cause him to take the next step. Like Elijah he was drawn toward the voice. For some inscrutable reason he asked to be allowed to leave the boat and go toward Jesus rather than asking Jesus to come to them in the boat. The boat did provide some proof against the storm. But if Peter was not deceived by what he saw, Jesus possessed in himself an even greater stability. If it was not an illusion, Jesus seemed to be a greater shelter in the storm than the disciples' insufficient vessel.

God is our refuge and strength,
a very present help in trouble.
Therefore we will not fear though the earth give way,
though the mountains be moved into the heart of the sea,
though its waters roar and foam,
though the mountains tremble at its swelling (see Psalm 46:1-3).

We can't go where Jesus is merely on our own initiative. If we want to live in the shelter of his presence we must learn first, not to be content with the shelter of our inadequate vessels, and second to ask him to call us where he is, into the dynamism and adventure of discipleship. We don't go out because we are foolhardy adventure seekers. We go because it is always better to be close to Jesus than anything else. When we forget this motive there is no way for us to continue existing in that higher mode of living without sinking. We can't live the life we are meant to live as disciples on our own strength. Yet we are often tempted to look away from the one through whose grace we stand (see Romans 5:2) and toward the strength of the wind and waves of worldly circumstances. Slipping back into self-reliance is a pitfall that can probably never be avoided entirely. Fortunately, we have Jesus near at hand to catch us when (and not if) we fall. He can then bring us back to the boat of his Church, in which we now discover a new depth of peace and stability, that we may rest and be restored, recharged for our next adventure with him.

After they got into the boat, the wind died down.
Those who were in the boat did him homage, saying,
“Truly, you are the Son of God.”

Hillsong UNITED - Oceans (Where Feet May Fail)

Saturday, August 8, 2026

8 August 2026 - if it delays, wait for it

Graham Kendrick - We Believe

Jesus said in reply,
“O faithless and perverse generation, how long will I be with you?
How long will I endure you?
Bring the boy here to me.”

The disciples lack of faith made them like the generation of Israelites that wandered in the desert after the Exodus. This was a critique that Jesus occasionally leveled at the Pharisees, but here demonstrated that it was a problem that could even affect his own disciples. What was necessary for success for that generation who journeyed through the desert toward the promised land? They needed faith to believe that God would provide for them, and then they needed to act on that belief. They needed to avoid false alternatives or easy answers. When they were led to faced challenges that seemed to great for them alone they were meant to rely on God.

Jesus rebuked him and the demon came out of him,
and from that hour the boy was cured.
Then the disciples approached Jesus in private and said,
“Why could we not drive it out?”

The disciples seemed surprised that Jesus was able to rebuke the demon so easily when they had failed entirely. What was it exactly that made them fail, or what specifically was deficient in their faith? Clearly, by then, they had at least something like faith in Jesus. But it was not the specific faith necessary in this instance. Had they come to take for granted the availability of miracles, and believe that they could simply manifest them themselves, without any need for Jesus beyond a tacit acknowledgement of his name? Had they gotten so caught up in competition amongst one another that they came to believe that the real secret sauce for success was something one or another of them possessed rather than something available equally to all of them from Jesus? Was their failure, whatever it was specifically, a failure to remember God and depend on him as they pursued their goal, as it was for the generation in the desert? Quite possible. We must account for the fact that they had some sort of nascent faith but were unable to apply it in a particular situation. Maybe it was because the raw reality of the situation and their distance from Jesus at the time made it seem overwhelming. Whatever it was, they apparently brought none of such faith as they did possess to their attempts to help the afflicted son of this man, not even a mustard seed's worth.

Amen, I say to you, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed,
you will say to this mountain,
‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move.
Nothing will be impossible for you.”

The disciples were meant to bring the presence and power of Jesus into every moment of their lives. But instead they seemed to slip back into reliance on their own insufficient resources. Part of practicing the presence of God was remembering the all surpassing sufficiency that God possessed in himself, more than enough to address any challenge one might face in life. Naturally this can't mean that God always gives us everything we ask. But the very idea that he would is not compatible with our need for faith, as if it were finally about our plans for the world, rather than his own. Nothing will be impossible for us precisely when we ask from a posture of faith in which, like Jesus himself, we desire nothing more than that the Father's will be done. Faith allows us to submit with humility to the reality that God's timing is not our own. The answer to our prayers may well be 'Not yet' rather than 'No', provided we "wait for it".

If it delays, wait for it,
it will surely come, it will not be late.
The rash man has no integrity;
but the just man, because of his faith, shall live.

Friday, August 7, 2026

7 August 2026 - first step: denial

Hillsong UNITED - Lead Me To The Cross

Whoever wishes to come after me must deny himself,
take up his cross, and follow me.

The point was not that we should make ourselves miserable by subjecting ourselves to unnecessary suffering. The point was that our commitment to Jesus must be such that there is nothing on earth that we would prefer. In order to seek first the Kingdom we must be willing to deny ourselves other things, and limit other options. For one in the world there might be a variety of paths that are equally valid. But for the Christian the only valid path is to follow in the footsteps of Jesus.

We are called to live lives of self-sacrificial love. But, as any parent will attest, this involves a fair amount of self-denial. They might prefer to sleep, but often must choose the care of a child instead. They might have a variety of ways they would prefer to spend their income, but they must use it to provide the essentials of food, clothing, and other needs for their kids. They might prefer to sit back and relax. But the child might be hungry, or need a ride somewhere, or any of an infinite number of other possibilities. Parents know well that having children is a form that the cross of Jesus takes in their lives. But it is an area where they are often most able to perceive that it is worth it. Parents who don't perceive this, who tally up all the effort their children require, who only ever put their children because they feel forced to do so, end up with attitudes of animosity that prevent them from being good parents. But parenthood is a real example were it is often something extrinsic to ourselves that we must prefer over our intrinsic and, in that sense, more natural motivations. Parents can't always do even all of the good things they might wish. How much more, then, are followers of Jesus required to choose love of God and neighbor over the sinful inclinations, tendencies that remain in their hearts even after they come to faith in him. And there are a vast number of things which, good in themselves, must not be allowed to come before the call of Jesus to seek first his Kingdom in our lives.

For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it,
but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.

If we analyze the things we are tempted to prefer to life-giving selfless love we will find that they all have limited returns, whereas the return for love is infinite. Relaxation, sensual pleasure, power, and pride all have limits. They can never satisfy entirely no matter how much we dedicate heart and soul to their pursuit. Do we want to commit ourselves to love, which alone can outlast the temporal world? Or do we prefer to anchor our identity in things destined to disappear? This is not to say we don't enjoy the good things of this world in some measure. But we must consider whether the way we enjoy them is ordered to the praise and glory of God, or whether they have become instead idols and ends we pursue for their own sake.

For the Son of Man will come with his angels in his Father’s glory,
and then he will repay each according to his conduct.

It may seem that we can choose to love or fail to do so without consequence. But assuredly the consequences are only delayed. This delay prevents our love from being motivated only by our selfish desire for reward. But by choosing love we signal our desire to be transformed so as to live in love, love that is the self-definition of God, for all eternity. There is no greater reward possible. But it is possible to receive the reward for failing to choose love, in which our desire to be identified with that which is temporary and destined for destruction is granted. May neither we nor anyone ever so choose.

Amen, I say to you, there are some standing here
who will not taste death
until they see the Son of Man coming in his Kingdom.

Perhaps this passage referred to Peter, James, and John, who were soon to witness the Transfiguration. But it can refer to us as well. After all, this Sunday, and indeed every day, Jesus comes to the Kingdom of his Church as the Eucharistic Lord. We taste, not death, but the bread of life eternal. May we recognize, hidden in the plain white host, the Son of Man coming to us.

Thursday, August 6, 2026

6 August 2026 - We did not follow cleverly devised myths